www.chirpthird.com   
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» www.chirpthird.com » General Discussion » F-Body: Convertibles » Bilstein vs. Eibach Prokit - height change???

   
Author Topic: Bilstein vs. Eibach Prokit - height change???
RagSS
3rd Gear
Member # 1127

Icon 1 posted      Profile for RagSS   Author's Homepage   Email RagSS         Edit/Delete Post 
This may have been brought up before, but couldn't find it...
If anyone with a Bilstein suspension convertible switched to Eibach pro-kit springs, what was the front/rear ride height change?? (I'm particularly interested in the front)
Many have noted (myself included) that the front wheel well height on a bilstein equipped convertible is a tad too high. The rear sits fine, ...but I'd like the front to be about 1" lower. I believe this can be accomplished with the prokit springs(ie 1.2" drop).

I'm specifically interested in those with convertibles with the Bilstein that may have switched since there is a height difference with the Bilstein on a coupe vs. convertible. (vert rear sits lower) At least my car is like this and a couple others I've seen are the same.

Thanks,
Kevin

--------------------
Kevin Kolvenbach,
2002 Sunset Orange SS (#3455),
Convertible, Black top, Ebony leather,
Bilstein, ASR, 6SP w/Hurst,
345HP Dual-Dual

Posts: 1046 | From: Pine Bush, NY USA | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
02Z
New Member
Member # 1835

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 02Z   Email 02Z         Edit/Delete Post 
Here is some input, I have Decarbon equipped vert and T-top Z28. My vert sets lower in the back and higher in the front than T-top Z. Hope this helps, Victor
Posts: 3 | From: Stephens City, VA | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Slow SS
New Member
Member # 1385

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Slow SS   Email Slow SS         Edit/Delete Post 
My springs and shocks are going in this spring. I plan on cutting off half a coil on the front and hope that it evens things out.
Posts: 4 | From: Toronto | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
RagSS
3rd Gear
Member # 1127

Icon 1 posted      Profile for RagSS   Author's Homepage   Email RagSS         Edit/Delete Post 
...Thanks for the replies,
slowSS, ... I didn't want to cut the springs, but I've heard that 3/4 of a coil does do the trick.

Posts: 1046 | From: Pine Bush, NY USA | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
Xsta Z 28
2nd Gear
Member # 740

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Xsta Z 28   Author's Homepage   Email Xsta Z 28         Edit/Delete Post 
3/4 of a coil is TOO much! IMHO. 1/2 max. That is what I did.

Convertible's probably ride a little lower in the back due to the top weight, not thta it is much, but the vert is heavier in back the a T-Top.

Which leads me to another though. Engineers design these things, did they take into account that a covertible is heavier that a t-top when designing the springs? If that was so, the springs in a rag top should be different than a t-top. Just a thought.

Posts: 608 | From: Schaumburg, IL | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Zrag
New Member
Member # 1775

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Zrag   Email Zrag         Edit/Delete Post 
Yep took 1/2 turn off and no problems. Didn't want to but little choice.
Posts: 4 | From: Miami, Fla. | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
RagSS
3rd Gear
Member # 1127

Icon 1 posted      Profile for RagSS   Author's Homepage   Email RagSS         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
the springs in a rag top should be different than a t-top
...I would agree... but not sure. anyone?
Posts: 1046 | From: Pine Bush, NY USA | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | chirpthird.com | Privacy Statement

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.0