I am curious to know the E/T and your top speed and 60 foot times for those of us with LT1 engines. Please lmk if you got mods done and what they are, and if you are auto or six speed. Oh yeah and the tires you got OK here is my recent and best time for this year.
14.23 @ 99.32 mph....60 foot 2.23
Car is six speed bone stock running on Comp T/A m+s tires that spin everywhere. My only mod was removing the air filter. It was my 20th time running 1/4 mile in a standard trans car.
This should be neet to see. Please post em if you got em! Thanks
Posted by NATESS (Member # 982) on :
well, you would definitely improve your times with more traction. but that looks about average for LT1's. my old '99 Z did the best of 14 flat at 101 MPH.
Posted by 2002Z4CSS (Member # 1393) on :
No LT1 SS but a 1997 30th Anniversary Z28 T-Top Coupe that was bone stock with 55,000 miles.Automatic with 3:23's and stock Goodyear GSC's. It ran a best of 13.8 @ 102 with a 2.1 60'time. It was a consistant 13.9 @101 car.Seemed to be quicker at the track than most stock LT1 Camaros.Most ran 14.0-14.2 @ 97-98mph.At Camaro Superfest most stock LT1's made 230 RWHP and this one made 256 RWHP. That explains the little quicker at the track.
Posted by 30thSSNerd (Member # 2155) on :
quote:Originally posted by 2002Z4CSS: No LT1 SS but a 1997 30th Anniversary Z28 T-Top Coupe that was bone stock with 55,000 miles.Automatic with 3:23's and stock Goodyear GSC's. It ran a best of 13.8 @ 102 with a 2.1 60'time. It was a consistant 13.9 @101 car.Seemed to be quicker at the track than most stock LT1 Camaros.Most ran 14.0-14.2 @ 97-98mph.At Camaro Superfest most stock LT1's made 230 RWHP and this one made 256 RWHP. That explains the little quicker at the track.
I just had mine dynoed 2 weeks ago with an F-body group up here. I got 257 rear wheel hp and 297 tq without the aircleaner. I am sure with a 2.0- 2.1 60 foot I'm in the high 13's. Dragging a 6 speed is harder then I thought
[ 26. October 2003, 09:18 AM: Message edited by: 30thSSNerd ]
Posted by 2002Z4CSS (Member # 1393) on :
quote:Originally posted by 30thSSNerd:
quote:Originally posted by 2002Z4CSS: No LT1 SS but a 1997 30th Anniversary Z28 T-Top Coupe that was bone stock with 55,000 miles.Automatic with 3:23's and stock Goodyear GSC's. It ran a best of 13.8 @ 102 with a 2.1 60'time. It was a consistant 13.9 @101 car.Seemed to be quicker at the track than most stock LT1 Camaros.Most ran 14.0-14.2 @ 97-98mph.At Camaro Superfest most stock LT1's made 230 RWHP and this one made 256 RWHP. That explains the little quicker at the track.
I just had mine dynoed 2 weeks ago with an F-body group up here. I got 257 rear wheel hp and 291 tq without the aircleaner. I am sure with a 2.0- 2.1 60 foot I'm in the high 13's. Dragging a 6 speed is harder then I thought
The torque on my 30th Anniversary was 300 RWTQ. Pretty close to yours! Posted by 96ss1664 (Member # 1886) on :
I really dont have a 1/4 time on my car but it dynoed 280 rwhp at 309 ft lbs tq
Posted by 30thSSNerd (Member # 2155) on :
quote:Originally posted by 96ss1664: I really dont have a 1/4 time on my car but it dynoed 280 rwhp at 309 ft lbs tq
Wow! Is that bone stock? What mods if any? Thanks!
Posted by 30thSSNerd (Member # 2155) on :
quote:Originally posted by 2002Z4CSS:
quote:Originally posted by 2002Z4CSS: [qb]
The torque on my 30th Anniversary was 300 RWTQ. Pretty close to yours!
I made an error in my TQ Looking at my dyno I quoted the TQ from my first pull. My second pull was 297 @ 257hp...pretty close Posted by Diggler's HMS (Member # 1067) on :
quote:Originally posted by 96ss1664: I really dont have a 1/4 time on my car but it dynoed 280 rwhp at 309 ft lbs tq
My numbers were close, I got 279/301 out of it bone stock. Unfortunately the cars life was ended before I got the cajunes to take it to the track.
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
OK here is my recent and best time for this year.![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
Wow! Is that bone stock? What mods if any? Thanks!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
