This is topic looking to add a STB in forum F-Body: Convertibles at www.chirpthird.com.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.chirpthird.com/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi/ubb/get_topic/f/9/t/000291.html

Posted by lancemoreland (Member # 1478) on :
 
I am thinking of adding a STB on my vert. Which one fits best? I am thinking of getting the SLP one and having the bottom machined to allow for the irregular shape of the strut tower where it bolts up. I do not want to use washers to raise it up over the extra sheet metal on the strut towers. Anyone done this?
 
Posted by HTWLSS (Member # 117) on :
 
There is a recent discussion of STB's here:
http://www.chirpthird.com/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=3&t=010294

As far as the SLP STB, I haven't seen how it installs, but I'm sure we have someone here who is familiar with it.
 


Posted by Steve da Wrench (Member # 1301) on :
 
I just installed on SLP STB last week on a 2002 SS. The fit is very good. I do like your idea of machining the bottom to fit better, as that was my only complaint.
 
Posted by BamaZ (Member # 1105) on :
 
My Granatelli went on without a hitch in about 5 min. It seems more heavy duty than others I've seen.
 
Posted by lancemoreland (Member # 1478) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BamaZ:
My Granatelli went on without a hitch in about 5 min. It seems more heavy duty than others I've seen.

I did not know they made one. Do you have any pics. What about a web site.
 


Posted by Steve in Seattle (Member # 315) on :
 
I've the Hotchkis unit. Nice looking piece, and easy to do oil changes around witout moving it.

The "sturdyness" of your STB will only be as good as the sheer strength of the GM bolts. You're not really looking to increase chasis stiffness too much, just to prevent strut tower flex to maintain correct wheel geometry, while preventing too much weight being added to the front.

Remember, these cars are already front heavy, and will already understeer like mad in stock trim (especially if you're sporting drag radials out back ).

I took off my STB until the recent sub-frame installation which brought my handling closer to nutral.

It can be a useful tool, but don't get carried away looking for the EXTRA beefy one or a 3-point-you'll-never-uninstall-it design. Too much understeer can really ruin a RWD platform. You can't turn when you want, and you'll have to baby it around corners.

A fair bit of understeer is good for most people, the hardcore racing guys with HONEST EXPERIENCE look for a more nutral setting, but its not fun as a daily driver, thats why I slapped on my STB and tightened my LCA bolts a little more after the Sub frame connector installation (just to get a little more understeer to be consistant).

Throttle steerings fun from time to time, but I doubt I'd be as entertained on a wet highway corner.

Get which ever one looks the best and installs the easiest. They all function nearlly the same. (except for 3-point braces which I could NEVER deal with doing a 4 hour removal/installation any time work is to be done by me or my mechanic!)
 


Posted by BamaZ (Member # 1105) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by lancemoreland:

I did not know they made one. Do you have any pics. What about a web site.


They are at http://www.granatellimotorsports.com

I got mine during a GP for $75
 


Posted by BPS (Member # 1260) on :
 
The only benefit I found from my STB is that it provides a great hand hold when leaning across the engine.

waste of $100 ... IMHO of course
 


Posted by GORT (Member # 1267) on :
 
I installed a heavy duty tunnel brace and a chromoly STB, both from BMR fabrication, at the same time. I found a definate decrease in cowl shake. I don't know if it was the tunnel brace or the STB or a little of both but I was happy either way. The chromoly STB is really light too so I only added about 5lbs to the front of the car. Plus it looks cool
 
Posted by BPS (Member # 1260) on :
 
make that 2 benefits - it does look cool
 


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.0