posted
Allright, I put a few shots of the rear pieces onto the web. I was planning on getting the Xenon pieces in the front, left and right sides. I'm debating on getting the Xenon or WingsWest rear piece. Check out the pics and gimme some feedback on which you all think looks better for the rear, the Xenon or WingsWest.
posted
Personally, I am not fond of body kits at all. I really don't like either wing in the pictures. I guess I am a little old and conservative! But, whatever you decide on is great. As long as you like it that all that matter. Enjoy! Posts: 5946 | From: Litchfield, NH, USA | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
I would stick with the stock rear pieces. The stock spoiler looks much better than those wings!
-------------------- Amy F00-1724 2000 SS Navy Blue Metallic/ Black Top, Ebony Leather, ASR, SLP Floor Mats, car cover, dash plaque and Key fobs BMR STB, SLP SS Chrome 10 spokes with SS Centercap, Carbon Fiber Whisper Lid, SLP SS Grille, Camaro SS Fuel Rail Covers and KBDD SFCs SSOA Founding Member: http://www.camarossoa.org Posts: 818 | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
I don't care for any of the pieces, but everyone shows their individuality by making their car the way they want. It's ultimately up to you what you like best.
posted
Allright, I think you missed my intent. I was asking about the body kits, that does not include the wings. I'm refering to the REAR piece, the one near the ground.
-------------------- Matt - Orlando, FL - CFFB #49
The SS emblems alone are enough to scare most cars away. Camaro SS Posts: 55 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
I had the Wings West body kit on my old 94 V6 Camaro, and my overall opinion was that I didnt like them. The parts were installed by the techs at Wings West themselves, but they still seemed to fall off the car. Just bolting and taping urethane to urethane doesn't hold that well at all. Although the agressive look they gave off was awesome, it was a serious pain to worry about ground clearance. EVERYTHING scrapes, and in the end the body kit looks like a messed up rice rocket.
Back to your question though, I think the Xenon rear kit looks better on the car, but the front kit I'd definitely go with the Wings West piece. Though I like the idea that the Xenon front piece is all one integrated piece, it just looks nasty. So Xenon rear, Wings West rear, and the sides... well either seems to work well. Have fun!
-- Bobby T.
[ 08 January 2002: Message edited by: Crazy Horse ]
[ 08 January 2002: Message edited by: Crazy Horse ]
-------------------- Bob Trujillo Camaro SSOA Webmaster camaro@highballer.com Posts: 114 | From: Hermosa Beach, California | Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
OK revised opinion...leave the front alone and add the lower treatment that comes with the CME if anything. These cars are beautiful, with few exceptions, less is more.
-------------------- 2000 SS Convertible, M6, Onyx Ebony leather, Hurst, Monsoon, 12 CD SLP Options: Syntech, Mats, Fobs, Plaque, Cover. SLP add ons:SS Grille, SLP Lid & K&N, smooth bellows, SLP CAI.... Other Add Ons: TTS LT headers Y Pipe and Cats, TR 220, LS6 Intake, GMMG, ASP underdrive pulley, Hypertech 180 stat, Granatelli MAF, Rapid Motor Sports custom tuning, BMR STB, LCAs, Relocation brackets, Adj. Panhard, Don Goetz bolt on SFCs, Hotchkis springs, Hurst Billet Plus shifter Appearance: FRCs with afterthoughts SS overlays, Mark's Caliper decals on black painted calipers, AR TTIIs (Gunmetal Spokes) with BFG Gforce T/A KDWs...
96 Impala SS Black Flowmasters SSOA, WCA, NAISSO Posts: 3403 | From: Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA | Registered: Dec 2000
| IP: Logged
Printer-friendly view of this topic
