www.chirpthird.com   
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» www.chirpthird.com » SSOA and friends » SSOA: "Back Porch" » A thought regarding brake rotors - FB -

   
Author Topic: A thought regarding brake rotors - FB -
Hawkeye
5th Gear
Member # 88

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Hawkeye   Author's Homepage   Email Hawkeye         Edit/Delete Post 
With the usual chatter about warping rotors I
happen to notice in the main shop manual (GM)
that the suggested torque for the front wheels
is 89 lb ft. I was always told to torque to
100 lb ft. - which I have been doing.

Anyone else notice this. It was not in the
spec section, but a section where they were
giving instruction that included re and re
the wheels. They stated to re-install the
wheels and torque to 89?

Also, spark plugs called for 25 lb ft. Mine were
in much harder than that. In fact one of the
plugs must have been put in by Hercules! I was
able to remove after much effort with a 1/2
inch drive ratchet!

--------------------
Hawkeye: SSOA F98-C98
 -

1998 SS - Black All Options - Mods
Whisper Lid, K & N, Lou's Short Stick, Shift Light, Skip Shift, SLP Y, Borla, 4:10's, BMR STB, SLP SFCs, Granatelli MAF, Hypertech III, 160 Stat, Mallory Billet Pedals, Metco Aluminum LCAs,Fast Toys Ram Air Mod, Spohn Panhard Bar, BMR Torque Arm, free EGR mod,power antenna, BMR LCA brackets, Gentex Temp/Compass Auto Dim Mirror, AllMaxx Strobe and Wig Wag, BAER Eradispeed rotors,PPC Headers with Random Technology Hi Flow Cats, BMR Drive shaft Loop,FAST 78MM Throttle Body, FAST 78MM Composite Intake, Mobil 1 & lots of Zaino.

Wife & Best Friend Mary - copilot.

Posts: 5558 | From: Windsor, Ontario. Canada | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged
blkragss02
3rd Gear
Member # 1801

Icon 1 posted      Profile for blkragss02   Author's Homepage   Email blkragss02         Edit/Delete Post 
90-100 lb ft. should prevent most rotor warping

--------------------
SLP OEM air-lid (painted) with Donaldson filter and CAI,
GMMG Chambered exhaust,GMS 200 MPH white gauges,3.73 Rear Axle, SS grille with silver logo, 5-Spoke ZR-1 Chrome Plated Wheels, SS Front Floor Mats, Commemorative Portfolio, Custom FRC's, D Goetz signature series SFC's and STB, Gentex Mirror, Power antenna,T/A shifter handle,clear corners, 160 Therm., HPP3 and Silver SS emblems with 345 hp decals painted calipers with Camaro decal car # 10252 41U Onyx Black -1 of 174 A4 verts


http://community.webshots.com/user/blkragss02

EMCC member #318
http://www.emcamaro.org/

 -

Posts: 1118 | From: Southgate, MI | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
BrostalSS
1st Gear
Member # 1830

Icon 1 posted      Profile for BrostalSS   Email BrostalSS         Edit/Delete Post 
Also, not abusing your brakes prevents warping. Dragging, them, hitting them hard to stop. Heat=Warpage.

I've never had problems with rotors warping and I don't even torque my lugs. I just hit 'em with my impact wrench to tighten them.

Posts: 231 | From: Valencia, Ca | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
SS_CarGuy
2nd Gear
Member # 2065

Icon 1 posted      Profile for SS_CarGuy   Email SS_CarGuy         Edit/Delete Post 
I have the F-body shop manual for 2000 and it clearly states 100. Where did you see 89?

--------------------
Dave S
Black 2000 Camaro SS

Posts: 502 | From: Fort Mill, South Carolina....Charlotte | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged
Happy_Dan
Forum Moderator
Member # 118

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Happy_Dan   Author's Homepage   Email Happy_Dan         Edit/Delete Post 
I am comfortable with 100 lbs. There has been lots of discussion about rotors and helping to prevent warping.

I would not just hit them with an impact wrench and I use them very hard at the track. There is a big difference between street driving and the track.

For the street, there are some basic precautions. When exiting the freeway and have to stop, use the E-Brake instead of holding your foot on the brake. With two pads pushed hard against a hot rotor, there is a potential for warpage by that alone.

Posts: 5946 | From: Litchfield, NH, USA | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged
Hawkeye
5th Gear
Member # 88

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Hawkeye   Author's Homepage   Email Hawkeye         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by SS_CarGuy:
I have the F-body shop manual for 2000 and it clearly states 100. Where did you see 89?

Section - 3-72 - Wheel installation says to
tighten to 100 lb ft.

Section - 6 - 1815 - Wheel replacement after
replacing exhaust system says to tighten to
89 lb ft.

GM Tech manuals. Hmmm???

--------------------
Hawkeye: SSOA F98-C98
 -

1998 SS - Black All Options - Mods
Whisper Lid, K & N, Lou's Short Stick, Shift Light, Skip Shift, SLP Y, Borla, 4:10's, BMR STB, SLP SFCs, Granatelli MAF, Hypertech III, 160 Stat, Mallory Billet Pedals, Metco Aluminum LCAs,Fast Toys Ram Air Mod, Spohn Panhard Bar, BMR Torque Arm, free EGR mod,power antenna, BMR LCA brackets, Gentex Temp/Compass Auto Dim Mirror, AllMaxx Strobe and Wig Wag, BAER Eradispeed rotors,PPC Headers with Random Technology Hi Flow Cats, BMR Drive shaft Loop,FAST 78MM Throttle Body, FAST 78MM Composite Intake, Mobil 1 & lots of Zaino.

Wife & Best Friend Mary - copilot.

Posts: 5558 | From: Windsor, Ontario. Canada | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged
Elie Garfinkel
2nd Gear
Member # 1635

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elie Garfinkel   Author's Homepage   Email Elie Garfinkel         Edit/Delete Post 
FWIW, The instructions I have, read 100 and therefore I tighten to 95. (what could it hoit?) [Wink] The previous comments about care are extremely important... as well as bedding in the pads and heat cycling the rotors properly when new. Following the proper cool-down procedure after hot lapping also contributes to maximizing rotor life, as well as using a "rotor-friendly" pad.

Best regardSS,

Elie

--------------------
 -
98 Camaro SS #C079
... a few mods
http://www.geocities.com/sselie
SSOA/TFbM/OMSC

Posts: 406 | From: Toronto, Canada | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Bill Mason
2nd Gear
Member # 1807

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bill Mason   Email Bill Mason         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Elie Garfinkel:
FWIW, The instructions I have, read 100 and therefore I tighten to 95. (what could it hoit?) [Wink] The previous comments about care are extremely important... as well as bedding in the pads and heat cycling the rotors properly when new. Following the proper cool-down procedure after hot lapping also contributes to maximizing rotor life, as well as using a "rotor-friendly" pad.

Best regardSS,

Elie

Actually, under torquing the lug nuts can hurt. Torquing the lug nuts puts a pre-load on the studs. This pre-load has to be greater than the actual force that the wheels will ever exert on the studs. In this way, the wheel does not become unseated from hub as would happen if the force exerted by the wheel was greater than the force created by torquing the lug nuts on the stud.

Also, if the studs are under torqued and the wheel forces cause additional stretching of the studs you can lead to fatique issues which can lead to stud failure (breakage).

IMHO, it is better to err on the side of slightly over torquing than to under torque. My two cents.

Posts: 383 | From: Oakville, Ontario Canada | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
2002LESS-Harry
1st Gear
Member # 1834

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 2002LESS-Harry   Email 2002LESS-Harry         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Hawkeye:

Section - 6 - 1815 - Wheel replacement after
replacing exhaust system says to tighten to
89 lb ft.

GM Tech manuals. Hmmm???

Would it be possible that this section deals with the v-6 models and that they are talking about steel wheels? I think that the torque setting for steel wheels may be lower than that for aluminum wheels, but I'm not sure.

--------------------
2002 LE convertible with all GM options LE #3079, SLP Build #C410

All SLP options except Auburn & G-Force
D. Goetz Fabrications STB and bolt-on SFCs, SLP LT headers and cats, Gentex mirror, power antenna with control switch, engine plaque, Mobile 1 applique and oil filler cap

Posts: 137 | From: Fergus, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
DaddySS
Old Coot.....50 going on 20
Member # 848

Icon 1 posted      Profile for DaddySS   Email DaddySS         Edit/Delete Post 
I always torque them to 50, then to 100, pump the brakes on long stops, try to anticipate stops (with my automatics) and downshift to add engine braking with the manuals, and have never had a warped rotor.
Posts: 3403 | From: Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA | Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged
poSSum
AutoXer
Member # 119

Icon 1 posted      Profile for poSSum   Email poSSum         Edit/Delete Post 
I take mine to whatever torque a 9.6 volt cordless generates, drop the car from the jack, then roll it forward and backward a couple of feet to ensure there is no side-loading from coming down off the jack. Then I torque to 40 - 70 - 100. With autoX, I end up changing the tires back and forth at least a dozen times a season.

I replaced the rotors and pads at about 55,000 miles and was shocked with how much life was left in the original pads and the rotors were still straight. A lot of driving was highway, but I figured autocross and drag racing would have used up more brake.

quote:
Originally posted by Hawkeye:
Also, spark plugs called for 25 lb ft. Mine were
in much harder than that. In fact one of the
plugs must have been put in by Hercules! I was
able to remove after much effort with a 1/2
inch drive ratchet!

If you haven't changed them previously, they may have been partially siezed rather than overtorqued originally.

[ 11. March 2004, 10:00 AM: Message edited by: poSSum ]

Posts: 4222 | From: Winnipeg MB CA | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged
mhayman
2nd Gear
Member # 146

Icon 1 posted      Profile for mhayman   Author's Homepage   Email mhayman         Edit/Delete Post 
I have always torqued mine to 100 ft. lbs. I do 50-75-100 increments.

The sad part is that I have had bad luck with the warpage issue on both my 98 and my 00. I had never had brake issues with ANY of my cars before I had the Camaro. I don't consider myself to be hard on brakes at all. I drive reasonably and don't race at the track. So I have been hard pressed to figure out the cause of this warpage.

After buying the Autozone replacements and not having one problem with them, I have come to the conclusion that it is GM's rotors, not driving style and not torque. While getting your brakes red hot while at the track and then sitting with your foot on the brake or torquing the lugs to 250 ft. lbs. will (and should) damage your brakes, I REALLY have a tough time believing that my exiting the freeway from 70 MPH and sitting at a light with my foot on the brake or torquing the lugs to 95-105 ft. lbs. will do major damage. What about when I drive through a puddle of water? Why are the rotors THAT sensitive? I have never known any other car to have rotors as sensitive as these.

Everyone on this board takes pretty good care of their cars. And a lot of us go to extremes to take care of the rotors only to have them warp anyway. I don't want to sit at a light with my E-brake on, or have to downshift and engine brake, or not be able to wash my car after I drive it just to keep the rotors from warping. I never did those things with any other car and never had a problem and that's why I just replaced them with an alternative that has worked well so far.

--------------------
Mark H.

Whoever said you couldn't run away from your problems obviously wasn't driving an SS.

Posts: 942 | From: Santa Barbara and Ventura, CA | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | chirpthird.com | Privacy Statement

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.0