This is topic IS SLP EVR GOING TO GET 2002 PRODUCTION INFO? in forum SSOA: "Back Porch" at www.chirpthird.com.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.chirpthird.com/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi/ubb/get_topic/f/3/t/013821.html

---

Posted by 2002 SLP SS (Member # 1893) on 03 October, 2003 02:45 PM:
 
We have been promised the SLP breakdown numbers for 2002 for over a year! The 2001 numbers were readily available! We purchased the cars, now that they are out of production can SLP complete there promise?
 

---

Posted by HTWLSS (Member # 117) on 03 October, 2003 03:15 PM:
 
I don't think it was promised, but more of a courtesy that SLP provided in past years. They are not obligated to give us the info. If we get it, we get it. If not, well, we don't.

SLP has other things to worry about right now. If they are ever able to get #'s out, I'm sure they will. I doubt it's at the top of the priority list at this point, especially since there's no one in Ste. Therese to help audit the numbers.
 

---

Posted by Jim Mac (Member # 113) on 03 October, 2003 03:29 PM:
 
My, aren't we pushy?
 

---

Posted by Hawkeye (Member # 88) on 03 October, 2003 04:18 PM:
 
Is this the build numbers thread all over
again?
 

---

Posted by Sparks (Member # 2028) on 03 October, 2003 06:49 PM:
 
No, it is the SS by options numbers. SLP has always made them available and it has become part of the SS lore. SLP has known the numbers since they accepted the order for the last car! They OWE it to their customers to provide these numbers.
You might have one of only a couple 02
SSs made and you need that information. It shows a complete disregard for SLP customers!

I ordered a car that I thought would be fairly rare and now I would like to know if I was right!!
 

---

Posted by Scott Chab (Member # 174) on 03 October, 2003 07:00 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
No, it is the SS by options numbers. SLP has always made them available and it has become part of the SS lore. SLP has known the numbers since they accepted the order for the last car! They OWE it to their customers to provide these numbers.
You might have one of only a couple 02
SSs made and you need that information. It shows a complete disregard for SLP customers!

I ordered a car that I thought would be fairly rare and now I would like to know if I was right!!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
No, it is the SS by options numbers. SLP has always made them available and it has become part of the SS lore. SLP has known the numbers since they accepted the order for the last car! They OWE it to their customers to provide these numbers.
You might have one of only a couple 02
SSs made and you need that information. It shows a complete disregard for SLP customers!

I ordered a car that I thought would be fairly rare and now I would like to know if I was right!!

---

you have one of 11,191 2002 SSs. it aint that rare.
 

---

Posted by JeffY (Member # 120) on 03 October, 2003 07:14 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
No, it is the SS by options numbers. SLP has always made them available and it has become part of the SS lore. SLP has known the numbers since they accepted the order for the last car! They OWE it to their customers to provide these numbers.
You might have one of only a couple 02
SSs made and you need that information. It shows a complete disregard for SLP customers!

I ordered a car that I thought would be fairly rare and now I would like to know if I was right!!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by JeffY:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
No, it is the SS by options numbers. SLP has always made them available and it has become part of the SS lore. SLP has known the numbers since they accepted the order for the last car! They OWE it to their customers to provide these numbers.
You might have one of only a couple 02
SSs made and you need that information. It shows a complete disregard for SLP customers!

I ordered a car that I thought would be fairly rare and now I would like to know if I was right!!

---

HERE WE GO AGAIN - WILL SOMEONE ELSE PLEASE ANSWER THIS PERSON. I CAN'T DO THIS AGAIN.

---

 

---

Posted by chrisL (Member # 97) on 03 October, 2003 07:19 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by JeffY:
HERE WE GO AGAIN - WILL SOMEONE ELSE PLEASE ANSWER THIS PERSON. I CAN'T DO THIS AGAIN.

---

 

---

Posted by JeffY (Member # 120) on 03 October, 2003 07:19 PM:
 
If you bought the only purple LS6 SS that we made, its rare. In fact, someone once pointed out that Z28's are rarer than SS's!!
 

---

Posted by Scott Chab (Member # 174) on 03 October, 2003 07:20 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by JeffY:
If you bought the only purple LS6 SS that we made, its rare.

---

DAMMIT!! I knew you guys were holding out!
 

---

Posted by 380SS (Member # 2078) on 03 October, 2003 07:22 PM:
 
Ding, Ding here we go with round two.


 

---

Posted by HTWLSS (Member # 117) on 03 October, 2003 07:26 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:

I ordered a car that I thought would be fairly rare and now I would like to know if I was right!!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by JeffY:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
No, it is the SS by options numbers. SLP has always made them available and it has become part of the SS lore. SLP has known the numbers since they accepted the order for the last car! They OWE it to their customers to provide these numbers.
You might have one of only a couple 02
SSs made and you need that information. It shows a complete disregard for SLP customers!

I ordered a car that I thought would be fairly rare and now I would like to know if I was right!!

---

HERE WE GO AGAIN - WILL SOMEONE ELSE PLEASE ANSWER THIS PERSON. I CAN'T DO THIS AGAIN.

---

That's what I meant about the build #'s. Just
be patient with SLP. Please read the build #'s
thread - then you'll understand what I meant.

Just Friday humour
 

---

Posted by JeffY (Member # 120) on 03 October, 2003 07:50 PM:
 
Here's the build number post:
http://www.chirpthird.com/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=013640
 

---

Posted by cytruffle (Member # 1733) on 03 October, 2003 08:04 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by JeffY:
Here's the build number post:
http://www.chirpthird.com/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=013640

---

This is all that needed to be said in answer to this person's question....IMHO....
 

---

Posted by el ess1 (Member # 1544) on 03 October, 2003 08:17 PM:
 
I was going to reply to this with "oh jeez, here we go again" but it looks like several beat me to it. This isn't EXACTLY like the build number thread, because nobody was outright demanding that SLP do something on that one.

I've said this before, and I'll say it again, the only rare car is the car you want and don't have. Rarity is in the mind of the beholder. As far as strictly numbers, a Pacer X is rare, compared to Camaro SS. But that doesn't make it more valuable.

I didn't buy my car and option it the way I wanted because I know my option list would be a bit outside the norm (hard-top). I ordered it because it fit MY wants to my satisfaction. No snot-nosed kid from down the street is going to buy my low-mile car 25 years from now, because I'm going to wring the good out of it for my own pleasure. My luck I'd die hardly ever driving the car and have the widow sell it for dirt.

You can't demand anyone give you a free tidbit if you have no vested interest in it. It's not like you paid for a birth certificate and never got it. While it would be very cool if SLP does finish the breakdown, it's not the end of the world if they don't. With the '69 Hurst/Oldses, it was nearly 30 years before any of the conversion documentation was found, and only 550 (a little over half) verified VINs were discovered even then.

It's probably in SLP's historical files, so given time to sort things out, they'll more than likely get to it sometime. But I wouldn't hold them to a deadline.

If the breakdown is that important to you, then volunteer your services to help assemble the list, if SLP will allow it. I'm sure they would if they had the time.
 

---

Posted by DanA_F99_1977 (Member # 118) on 03 October, 2003 08:47 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by el ess1:
I was going to reply to this with "oh jeez, here we go again" but it looks like several beat me to it. This isn't EXACTLY like the build number thread, because nobody was outright demanding that SLP do something on that one.

I've said this before, and I'll say it again, the only rare car is the car you want and don't have. Rarity is in the mind of the beholder. As far as strictly numbers, a Pacer X is rare, compared to Camaro SS. But that doesn't make it more valuable.

I didn't buy my car and option it the way I wanted because I know my option list would be a bit outside the norm (hard-top). I ordered it because it fit MY wants to my satisfaction. No snot-nosed kid from down the street is going to buy my low-mile car 25 years from now, because I'm going to wring the good out of it for my own pleasure. My luck I'd die hardly ever driving the car and have the widow sell it for dirt.

You can't demand anyone give you a free tidbit if you have no vested interest in it. It's not like you paid for a birth certificate and never got it. While it would be very cool if SLP does finish the breakdown, it's not the end of the world if they don't. With the '69 Hurst/Oldses, it was nearly 30 years before any of the conversion documentation was found, and only 550 (a little over half) verified VINs were discovered even then.

It's probably in SLP's historical files, so given time to sort things out, they'll more than likely get to it sometime. But I wouldn't hold them to a deadline.

If the breakdown is that important to you, then volunteer your services to help assemble the list, if SLP will allow it. I'm sure they would if they had the time.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by DanA_F99_1977:
ROI

---

You corporate geek!
 

---

Posted by DanA_F99_1977 (Member # 118) on 03 October, 2003 09:52 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Scott Chab:

quote:

---

Originally posted by DanA_F99_1977:
ROI

---

You corporate geek!

---

Yuppers, that way I can afford a car that runs.

Now if I can just learn to type, where's my admin??



[ 03. October 2003, 09:53 PM: Message edited by: DanA_F99_1977 ]
 

---

Posted by Scott Chab (Member # 174) on 03 October, 2003 09:57 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by DanA_F99_1977:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Scott Chab:

quote:

---

Originally posted by DanA_F99_1977:
ROI

---

You corporate geek!

---

Yuppers, that way I can afford a car that runs.

Now if I can just learn to type, where's my admin??

---

I can afford it... I just can't get it!
 

---

Posted by Avengeance Z4C (Member # 2053) on 04 October, 2003 02:59 AM:
 
Well.. my .02 personally.

Although I really enjoy being a part of SSOA... I purchased my membership mainly based on getting the build numbers for my car. The antenna flag, decals, and other cool stuff was just a "side dish" to what I really wanted. Although they are really cool items its not what I sent my $40 out for, personally.

I was really dissapointed when I got my packet and it didnt include the one thing I wanted, the build numbers.

Im not trying to disrespect anyone here... I TOTALLY understand that ish happens and SLP is in the middle of something right now that may take some time. Thing is if those types of things are being delayed right now it would be nice if the description of a SSOA members packet was fixed for the time being, I kinda feel mislead after finding out there are other people that have been waiting for the same thing for a lot longer. If I had known beforehand that these things were being delayed I would have held off until later to send my $40 out.

Either way its cool.. I dont mind waiting to get the numbers. That is, of course, it happens within the next couple months. If that point comes I may be half tempted to send the stickers and goodies back and request a refund of my $40.

Like I said, and Id like to reiterate, Im not angry at anyone.. not trying to disrespect anyone.. but thats how I feel.
 

---

Posted by DanA_F99_1977 (Member # 118) on 04 October, 2003 08:24 AM:
 
$40.00 for a number? You could get it for free if you want (still takes time it seems lately).

I felt as though the $40.00 was to support this site, organizing the events we have and to support the SSOA web page. (What ever happened to that?).

Oh, I like the flag too. It's great for finding each other at events!

[ 04. October 2003, 08:24 AM: Message edited by: DanA_F99_1977 ]
 

---

Posted by Avengeance Z4C (Member # 2053) on 04 October, 2003 10:43 AM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by DanA_F99_1977:
$40.00 for a number? You could get it for free if you want (still takes time it seems lately).

I felt as though the $40.00 was to support this site, organizing the events we have and to support the SSOA web page. (What ever happened to that?).

Oh, I like the flag too. It's great for finding each other at events!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
Hmmmm...this thread is remarkably similar to the knee jerk reactions that were so typical of the SLP board. Complete with witty, holier than thou, SLP mods. Cute!

---

same folks. you think we changed?



but seriously, you are off base. of course you are entitled to your opinion.

perhaps you would have not elicited such a response if it wasnt your first post here. we had just beaten this topic to death in the thread Jeff posted above.
 

---

Posted by JeffY (Member # 120) on 04 October, 2003 11:56 AM:
 
Sparks - SLP doesn't owe you a thing! You have only two posts on this board and both are whining about the build number.Where in your purchase agreement with GM or SLP does it say anything about supplying you with a build number? It doesn't. If you really think that that number will make your car worth more money in 20 years, most of us on this board have bridges and property that we would like you to buy. I suggest you go to CAD day and complain personally to Scott Settlemire of Chevrolet and Ed Hamburger that you were cheated - and bring your contract.

[ 04. October 2003, 11:57 AM: Message edited by: JeffY ]
 

---

Posted by Scott Chab (Member # 174) on 04 October, 2003 12:02 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
Hmmmm...this thread is remarkably similar to the knee jerk reactions that were so typical of the SLP board. Complete with witty, holier than thou, SLP mods. Cute!

I have spent plenty of money with SLP having bought 3 SSs in the past 4 years! SLP seems to have adopted the attitude that "we made our money on you, now beat it". SLP has a duty to it's CUSTOMERS to supply us with the numbers only they have!

You guys who are saying it doesn't matter will change your tunes in about ten years. Twenty years from now the numbers will be invaluable!

As for the corvette comment I have no idea what that means but yes, I do have a Z06 and a ZL1 for that matter but a 1LE camaro is just as much fun to drive to me(as the Z06) and more rare! I'd like to know how rare.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
Hmmmm...this thread is remarkably similar to the knee jerk reactions that were so typical of the SLP board. Complete with witty, holier than thou, SLP mods. Cute!

I have spent plenty of money with SLP having bought 3 SSs in the past 4 years! SLP seems to have adopted the attitude that "we made our money on you, now beat it". SLP has a duty to it's CUSTOMERS to supply us with the numbers only they have!

You guys who are saying it doesn't matter will change your tunes in about ten years. Twenty years from now the numbers will be invaluable!

As for the corvette comment I have no idea what that means but yes, I do have a Z06 and a ZL1 for that matter but a 1LE camaro is just as much fun to drive to me(as the Z06) and more rare! I'd like to know how rare.

---

Do me a favor and look on your window sticker to see if you were charged for a build #. If not, it isn't something that is owed to you by anyone.
 

---

Posted by el ess1 (Member # 1544) on 04 October, 2003 12:38 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
They OWE it to their customers to provide these numbers.

---

quote:

---

You might have one of only a couple 02
SSs made and you need that information.

---

quote:

---

I ordered a car that I thought would be fairly rare and now I would like to know if I was right!!

---

Fair enough, but I think that you're confusing rare-optioned with a rare car. The 02 SS is far from rare. But why do you care if it's rare or not? The only reason anyone would really care is if their ego needed it or if they wanted to sell it and maximize their profit, to which neither of those things apply to me. Maybe that's why I can't relate. I only buy stuff if I want it and plan on keeping it. Rarity doesn't play a factor in my purchases.

And, as for anyone paying $40 for a ~lifetime~ membership to the SSOA, why worry that you don't get your number in a month or two?....
 

---

Posted by Sparks (Member # 2028) on 04 October, 2003 01:17 PM:
 
You boys need to get your noses out of the Hamburger butt and get a clue. SLP could and should have made these numbers available long ago!

Jefffy - your remarks are typical of SLP and it's attitude. And of course they are not legally obligated to release those numbers. Morally, maybe.

Get it through your heads guys; SLP is through with you. They have made their money on you and you are of no further use.

As far as rarity goes how many were built means absolutely nothing. The 69 camaro was made by the tens of thousands. The rare ones are the valuable ones. Priced a 69 ZL1 lately?? 69
SS? Z28?

And what the hell does Settlemire have to do with this? This is a SLP issue.

Lemme know about the bridges. I've always wanted my very own.
 

---

Posted by Avengeance Z4C (Member # 2053) on 04 October, 2003 01:58 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by el ess1:
And, as for anyone paying $40 for a ~lifetime~ membership to the SSOA, why worry that you don't get your number in a month or two?....

---

I know I know... I am really glad I joined SSOA. I really like the "brotherhood" of SS owners in general, I get thumbs up from other SS owners all the time. Being a part of SSOA further enhances that "brotherhood." Im not sure if that makes sense to anyone but it does to me.

The only thing I ask is that if something is going to be delayed, such as those build numbers, then it would only be fair that it be stated somewhere on the page that explains the contents of the membership packet. Thats all.

I know some people here are upset that SLP is now witholding these numbers from the general public, at least witholding them until you pay them $50. I dont believe SLP owes anyone anything just cause we bought these cars. HOWEVER... some people, such as the majority of us here, bought these cars knowing we were somehow tied into a great company and that the cars with the SLP options are the "Top Dogs." Now... with that in mind you would expect a reputable company to provide excellent customer service... which they have in the past. We all understand their current status with employees and that nobody is in business for free, hence "selling" the build numbers now. So I dont blame them for selling the numbers now but if you ask me I think its just wrong, and thats just my opinion.

Personally I want these numbers cause I would like to dress up my car to show it, SLP engine plaque, nice car plaque with stand for shows, etc...

My family has owned a few rare Chevrolets.. ex 69 DZ 302 Camaro and a 71 LS5 454 SS Elky to name just a couple. My uncles that had these cars had every build number, casting number, paint codes, etc.. all on one sheet. Id like to do the same.

Once again.. Im not mad at anyone that organizes the packets.. I know how internet conversations can come off a bit strong and left open to interpretation. Ill patiently wait for my numbers as long as I know for sure they are coming and wont take a year to get.
 

---

Posted by JeffY (Member # 120) on 04 October, 2003 02:28 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
You boys need to get your noses out of the Hamburger butt and get a clue. SLP could and should have made these numbers available long ago!

Jefffy - your remarks are typical of SLP and it's attitude. And of course they are not legally obligated to release those numbers. Morally, maybe.

Get it through your heads guys; SLP is through with you. They have made their money on you and you are of no further use.

As far as rarity goes how many were built means absolutely nothing. The 69 camaro was made by the tens of thousands. The rare ones are the valuable ones. Priced a 69 ZL1 lately?? 69
SS? Z28?

And what the hell does Settlemire have to do with this? This is a SLP issue.

Lemme know about the bridges. I've always wanted my very own.

---

What do you mean - typical of SLP. I don't work for them. And its not an SLP issue-the SS belongs to GM and Settlemire is their represenattive. And what do you mean morally obligated? What the hell makes you think that? Did you only join this board to complain? About a stinking number. Never drive your car again until that number is known!!
 

---

Posted by Sparks (Member # 2028) on 04 October, 2003 05:40 PM:
 
SLP made the mods and I have to believe was sophisticated enough to keep up with what they were doing. Maybe GM does have the numbers, I'll check.

I am keeping my 02, Blk, A4, 1LE, leather, etc. for someone who won't be able to drive it for 15 years or so if ever. I'd simply like to be able to say, "There are -- SSs that were made just like yours." That's all I'm asking.

One more point. For the millionth time we've all heard......cars don't make good investments. Some do some don't. I can't see in to the future or I would have put away a couple ZL1s in 1970. (And kept a 66 Shelby Mustang with a factory Paxton supercharger, damn-it!) I do think, however, that the LS1 series of SSs is one of the most underated muscle cars of all time. The combination of the hood and the spoiler just add the finishing touches to a beautiful car. Look closely at the lines sometime (muscular in my opinion). The catfish nose takes a little getting used to but from other angles and especially the rear, few cars look better to me.
 

---

Posted by 2002 SLP SS (Member # 1893) on 04 October, 2003 10:17 PM:
 
This thread turned into a FLAME! As far as a build number that is not what was meant! I am as anal as many on here and just wanted as was said the production figures from SLP that were going to be sent to Scott Settlemire (Fbodyfather), and be posted on this board! These numbers contain for example how many red cars had Auburns, along with complete breakdown like the 01's had! Sorry this thread turned into a battle and disagreement from many of us. The SSOA and Jeff has been trying there best to keep everyone happy! Does anyone else have the time like Teri to devote to help out SS owners? This is a great board and without the SLP being restored this is the only board left to air our views!
 

---

Posted by SSHEETS (Member # 1989) on 05 October, 2003 12:19 AM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
No, it is the SS by options numbers. SLP has always made them available and it has become part of the SS lore. SLP has known the numbers since they accepted the order for the last car! They OWE it to their customers to provide these numbers.
You might have one of only a couple 02
SSs made and you need that information. It shows a complete disregard for SLP customers!

I ordered a car that I thought would be fairly rare and now I would like to know if I was right!!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sparks:
The catfish nose takes a little getting used to but from other angles and especially the rear, few cars look better to me.

---

Yeah...Arnie saw my car and said "nice AhSS"
 

---

Posted by RagSS (Member # 1127) on 06 October, 2003 07:29 AM:
 
I hesitate to post in this thread since it seems it's becoming more of a political debate than a discussion on the "back porch".
I guess at some point in time "the numbers" will appear. YES, I'd like to see them too (as a courtesy to the customers), ...but if it doesn't happen, ...Oh well that's the way it goes. It's not like SLP is obligated to provide them.
As for the SSOA, ...how did they get pulled into this? They aren't involved with these numbers, ...unless I completely missed something I don't think they were ever obligated to supply them. There may be a statement in the packet that indicates they will provide whatever information THEY have, but if they don't have it, ...surely they can not be expected to provide it.
As for Scott Settlemire, ...Scott DID provide Chevrolet production numbers for the various model years (inlcuding 2002). These did not include 2nd sticker content which I believe would come from SLP if/when provided (This I know is the piece most are interested in).

Yes it would be nice to get the production numbers, but SLP doesn't owe us anything. I'm also very happy to be a member of the SSOA, ...the many friends I've made are surely worth more than 40 bucks
Lastly, ...I hope to enjoy the SS parked in my garage for many years to come and look forward to meeting more members of the SSOA, ...some who I'll see at SLP's customer appreciation day this weekend...

Kevin
 

---

Posted by Sparks (Member # 2028) on 06 October, 2003 09:44 AM:
 
Noboby is dragging anybody into anything. It is simply a matter of some of us who plan to keep our SSs wanting to know how many just like ours were made. This info was ALWAYS made available to us in the past. These numbers will become more valuble in the coming years and probably more difficult to get if we don't get them soon.

Before Dave closed the SLP board he said the numbers would be forthcoming. I think he will eventually post them.
 

---

Posted by DanPazich (Member # 1352) on 06 October, 2003 10:00 AM:
 
Man O man! I dont wanna get involved in this but I like to think that this is a close-knit community of f-body enthusiasts! No bashing, flamining, etc needed. It's a great place to 'hang out' and chat with great people here. Remember, it's about the people, not the cars, and I'm so glad I joined the SSOA for just that reason a few years ago.

Now then...I must go hunt the Janitor down and let HER do her thing
 

---

Posted by Avengeance Z4C (Member # 2053) on 06 October, 2003 10:43 AM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by RagSS:

As for the SSOA, ...how did they get pulled into this? They aren't involved with these numbers, ...unless I completely missed something I don't think they were ever obligated to supply them.

---

RagSS..

Right off the SSOA main page , registration info.

Owners of 35th Anniversary LE Camaros will receive an additional piece of signed documentation for their vehicle, and be logged in the Official 35th Anniversary LE Owners Registry. This documentation will state your individual LE production number.


 

---

Posted by CamaroSCG (Member # 1591) on 07 October, 2003 06:33 AM:
 
Well, this will have to do for now, until the final numbers come out-
2002 Camaro numbers

posted 07-22-2002 11:13 AM
in the Camaro SS forum

As provided by Scott Settlemire

again, these numbers are UNOFFICIAL, so dont run out and get any car show signs made.

A total of 41,777 Camaros were built for worldwide distribution..

8,083 were convertibles
11,191 were SSs.
13,614 were Z28 or B4C Special Service

29,034 were Automatics -- 69.5%
10,188 were 6-speeds ? 24.4%
2,555 were 5-speeds ? 6.1%

Colors:
#1 81U Bright Rally Red 10,329 24.7%

#2 41U Onyx Black 8,426 20.2%

#3 11U Light Pewter Metallic 5,914 14.2%

#4 13U Sebring Silver 4,907 11.7%

#5 28U Navy Blue Metallic 4,674 11.2%

#6 10U Arctic White 3,805 9.1%

#7 71U Sunset Orange Metallic 1,875 4.5%

#8 44U Monterey Maroon Metallic 1,834 4.4%

(#9) 01U (Police Two Tone) 13 0.01%

(note: B4C avail with special two-tone paint lines using existing factory colors)

Camaro SS

SS Coupe with 6-speed: 4,811 6.6% of total production

81U 1,617 33.6%

41U 1,349 28.0%

28U 482 10.0%

13U 465 9.7%

11U 403 8.4%

71U 263 5.5%

10U 232 4.8%

SS Coupe with Automatic 3,527 4.9% of total production

81U 1,443 40.9%

41U 645 18.3%

11U 307 8.7%

13U 306 8.7%

28U 297 8.4%

71U 283 8.0%

10U 246 7.0%

SS Convertible with 6-speed 1,297 1.8% of total production

81U 739 57.0%

41U 227 17.5%

28U 86 6.6%

13U 78 6.0% (5 with "Z7D" Brickyard 400 Pkg)

11U 74 5.7%

10U 52 4.0%

71U 41 3.2%

1,164 had 41T Black Conv. Top

103 had 56T Neutral Conv. Top

30 had 10T White Conv. Top

SS Convertible with Automatic 1,556 2.1% of total production

81U 975 62.7%

41U 174 11.2%

13U 141 11.2% (52 units "Z7D" Brickyard 400"

11U 88 5.7%

10U 73 4.7%

28U 59 3.8%

71U 46 3.0%

1,410 had 41T Black conv. top

110 had 56T Neutral conv. top

36 had 10T White conv. top

There were no "1LE" Camaros produced in the 2002 model year at Ste.
Therese Assembly..SLP Engineering offered this option as a "second sticker"
option....

Camaro B4C Special Service with Automatic Trans 583 units

41U 320 units 54.9%

10U 114 19.6%

28U 42 7.2%

13U 33 5.7%

44U 29 5.0%

11U 25 4.3%

01U (spec. 2tone) 13 2.2%

71U 1 0.2%

Camaro B4C Special Service with 6-speed 125 units

41U 62 49.6%

81U 18 14.4%

10U 14 11.2%

13U 12 9.6%

28U 8 6.4%

71U 7 5.6%

44U 2 1.6% (tie)

11U 2 1.6% (tie)

24.071 Camaros had CC1 Removable roof panels 57.6% of production

24,805 Camaros were Z28 or SS (had LS1 Engine) which is 59.4% of build.

16,972 Camaros were V-6 with the 3800 engine which is 40.6% of build

2,968 Camaros were built with NG1 Northeast Emissions (7.1%)

33,180 Camaros were built with FE9 Federal Emissions (79.4%)

5,224 Camaros were built with YF5 California Emissions (12.5)

33,580 Camaros were ordered as "Stock" orders by dealers

5,951 Camaros were ordered as "Sold" orders by dealers (customers special
ordered their Camaro)

2,246 Camaros were ordered as "Fleet" by dealers (for Police, federal
government, and large business/rental/concerns.)

2,412 V-6 Camaros were ordered with Y87 Package, of which 360 were "sold"
orders

4,985 Camaros were ordered with the Y3F Sport Appearance package, of which
457 were "sold" orders.

443 Camaros were ordered with the Y3B SLP Rally Sport Package, of which 29
were "sold" orders.

11,191 Camaros were ordered with the "WU8" SS Performance and Appearance
Package, of which 3,662 were "sold" orders ? and 63 were "fleet" orders.

Total Camaro Interior Counts:

11,461 were built with 19B Ebony "Congo-Lexington"Cloth

16,276 were built with 192 Ebony "Supersoft - Sierra" Leather

3,367 were built with 193 Ebony/Pewter "Supersoft-Sierra" Anniv. Spec.
Leather

3,767 were built with 522 Neutral "Supersoft - Sierra" Leather

6,754 were built with 92B Medium Gray "Congo-Lexington" Cloth

117 were built with 194 Ebony Prado Leather (Europe and Russia only)

35 were built with 524 Neutral Prado Leather (Europe and Russia only)

208 Convertibles were built with 10T white convertible top

6,924 convertibles were built with 41T black convertible roof

951 convertibles were built with 56T neutral convertible roof.

28,567 Camaros were built with "UK3" Leather wrapped steering wheel with
duplicate radio controls

8,866 Camaros were built with "U1S" 12 disc remote CD changer

30,160 were built with "C49" Rear Defogger. . .only 72.2%

19,865 were built with "NW9" Traction Control.

I hope you will find these figures helpful. I'm sorry that the numbers
cannot be broken down further.
 

---

Posted by LSV1970 (Member # 2056) on 07 October, 2003 09:50 AM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by CamaroSCG:


117 were built with 194 Ebony Prado Leather (Europe and Russia only)

---

one here
I was told that mine is one of the 9 sold in Switzerland. Why? Almost no one is interested to buy a barely usable (too big, no room, small trunk) high costing (insurance, gas...)car in the area.

BTW: metall + fiber + petrol + human genius = 1 car

Enjoy it, use it and keep the picture to show to your grandchildren and illustrate when you were "though" .
 

---

Posted by HTWLSS (Member # 117) on 07 October, 2003 12:31 PM:
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Avengeance Z4C:

quote:

---

Originally posted by RagSS:

As for the SSOA, ...how did they get pulled into this? They aren't involved with these numbers, ...unless I completely missed something I don't think they were ever obligated to supply them.

---

RagSS..

Right off the SSOA main page , registration info.

Owners of 35th Anniversary LE Camaros will receive an additional piece of signed documentation for their vehicle, and be logged in the Official 35th Anniversary LE Owners Registry. This documentation will state your individual LE production number.

---

The 35th Anniversary registry is stil in development. After it's in place, that additional letter will be produced.

In the meantime, contact Hookerf14 with your 35th info. He's our resident SSOA member who is working on that registry.
 

---

Posted by TimeLord (Member # 1389) on 08 October, 2003 11:53 PM:
 
This is RARE,all the rest are run of the mill knockoffs !!!!!!!





[ 09. October 2003, 12:08 AM: Message edited by: TimeLord ]
 

---

Posted by The Janitor (Member # 2035) on 09 October, 2003 08:15 AM:
 
This thread has gone on way too long.

Bottom line, no one associated with this message board has control as to when/if SLP provides detailed build information for the 2002 model year.
 

---

UBB.classic™ 6.7.0